NEWS & POLITICS
VelvetPRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC 04 December 2009 |
|
Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution kept me busy in 1989. There was suddenly so much to do. The developments of each day, each hour, brought new surprises and concerns -- and more work as I struggled to keep up with the pace of events. It was one of the most exciting times of my life, and no one knew what was going to happen next, though I certainly tried as hard as anyone else to guess how it would end.
Of course, the outcome was less of a personal matter for me than it was for the fifteen million Czechs and Slovaks who were wrapped up in the velvetiness of it all. Meanwhile, I was among just the many hundreds in the U.S. intelligence community busily vacuuming up all the fuzzy bits we could suck in from over the horizon in Germany.
As everyone -- well, almost everyone -- has been remembering these past weeks, it all turned out pretty well, at least at the beginning when freedom (then still a term with an unblemished reputation) was the most tangible outcome. I lost my job, but I got another one. Unlike with real estate and cars, there's always a big market out there for intelligence products of one kind or another.
Eventually, I came to Czechoslovakia in the physical sense. Back then, in 1990, there was a stark contrast when you crossed the border from Bavaria into the Western Bohemian town of Rozvadov. You could smell the difference in the acrid pall of soft brown coal smoke hanging everywhere. It was the first sign that freedom was going to be a messy business.
By the time the Velvet Revolution gave way to the Velvet Divorce and the Czech-Slovak breakup, I was already living in Prague. When the split happened at the stroke of 1993's first midnight, the underwhelming nonchalance in Prague made the historic moment almost a non-event. Perhaps Czechs would have been more excited if they had known how things were soon going to turn out in Slovakia.
Throughout the 1990s, Václav Havel's presence as former dissident cum philosopher president always reminded me that I had missed the truly electric atmosphere of those heady fall days of '89, making me feel even more like an outsider. Not only didn't I know what it was like to live under communism, but I also hadn't been there to see what happened when everyone suddenly stopped doing so.
Last month's 20th anniversary of the start of the Velvet Revolution found me back in Prague more than eight years after I left and travelled off to live and work in places like Haiti and Iraq. Those experiences and everything we came to know in the world of 9/11 and beyond made the horizon of that "New World Order" I once thought I could see from Germany seem ridiculously far away.
After nearly a decade away, Prague has changed significantly. For one thing, there are many more adults walking the streets today who, like me, not only lack personal experience under the old regime, but also weren't around in a meaningful way for The Revolution. (Here I'm including everyone under the age of 30, i.e., anyone who wasn't at least 10 years old in 1989.)
The other big change -- and it had already been well underway for quite some time when I left in 2001 -- is that America and Americans hold a place of much less prominence in the minds of young people than we occupied in the imagination of their elders, who saw us both as an ideal and a tempting forbidden fruit. These days you can get your Amerika fix without even knowing it simply by buying an iPod to help you tune out the rest of the world. Call it consumerism, or call it democracy: sometimes it's hard to tell the difference when your inner voice isn't on your playlist.
But just when I thought that even my status as an irrelevant foreigner had itself become irrelevant, young Czechs who have launched something they call a "Democracy Checkup" got my attention. These are mostly college students born right around 1989 who are themselves trying to define their role in a country whose most familiar moment is unknown to them personally. They are strangers in a familiar land, so we have a little bit in common.
While attending a few of the events they sponsored and listening to what they had to say, I realized that idealized notions of America and, from a cynical point of view, what some would more or less affectionately call quaint (dare I say hopeful?) expectations about the true power and potential of vigorously exercised citizenship in a democracy are alive and well in Bohemia, and even somewhat inspired by an American case that is nonetheless in many ways as misunderstood here as it is in our own country.
One might wonder how long it will take these students to become resignedly, rather than merely bitterly, disillusioned, perhaps not unlike many among the generation of dissidents and protestors whose torch they would take up in their quest to shine their own light in the dimmer corners of a society whose dimensions have expanded, yet whose inner civic space they and others (including Václav Havel, in fact) feel has not yet grown in every positive direction needed to fill the resulting emptiness.
Or could their peers have something else in mind? As one young man put it at a debate I observed, "Maybe people aren't taking an active role in trying to change things because they're happy with their lives the way they are." Now that sounds much more like the self-interested and insular model of democracy I've always known and voted for, even though it's superficially disrupted by fits of discontent accompanied by slogans and speeches (albeit necessarily without the lighting of torches).
On November 17, the anniversary of the start of the Velvet Revolution, my wife -- who does remember singing on Wenceslas Square 20 years ago -- and I joined thousands of others who recreated the student march through Prague to Národní třída, the boulevard where the fateful clash with security forces occurred in 1989. It was my second vicariously experienced Velvet Revolution, though one whose virtual reality was much more three-dimensionally satisfying than the previous version.
Before the parade started, there were the inevitable proclamations, and the last words to the crowd came from a young man who reminded everyone that, no matter how flawed Czechs' democratic society might seem to them, there are many lands where people live much worse. Though he may have been thinking of North Korea or Cuba, my own experiences elsewhere tell me that he's onto something that's worth remembering, though without becoming overly complacent (nor, indeed, too cocksure) about the implications: Things can always be better in a democracy; but they are always likely to be a lot worse in places where poverty and violence are more abundant than even imperfect liberty.
|
||
Related Posts |









I am suddenly very proud of my Bohemian ancestry. Dirty gypsies indeed! And my American nationality. *wave flag(s)* wooo!
Why do I feel like I have to run and hide after expressing my pride in democracy?
Maybe we deserve a little filthy, coal-choked commie oppression. Remind us what we’re doing here in the first place.
Thanks for this.
So, with your Bohemian roots, your enthusiasm for hockey, and the tiger profile pic, should I assume Slavia is your hockey team? (Mind you, I’m a Sparta fan, and we just got stomped by Slavia for the second time in a row…)
Meanwhile, I’m sure I’m not the first to observe that the more you travel around the world, the more you learn about — or at least stop to consider — the place you come from. It’s all about contrast and comparison. That’s my personal theory of relativity.
Well, not necessarily. One of the guys who used to play for the Wild would play for Trencin-Slovakia (I think that was the name) when he was holding out on signing a contract, but I think that makes me like them less, not more. We got rid of him and his fancy run-away-home attitude, though, and traded him for a Czech. Things are better now.
If we’re talking Olympics, I’d root for the Czech Republic. The tiger is just for intimidating my fellow TNB commenters, lest an argument break out and things get toothy.
And sure, it’s not an outrageous sentiment to say that being away from home makes you appreciate home, but it’s one that’s worth repeating. And I knew nothing about the Velvet Revolution until you started talking about it in recent weeks. So, you know. Informative to boot.
I almost forgot how many Czechs are playing over there in the NHL. And, yeah, I always root for the Czechs in international competition, even when they’re playing the USA (gulp!). It’s funny, because the most patriotic outpouring I had ever seen here before the 20th anniversary commemoration was when the Czechs won the gold at Nagano in ‘98. But, hey, when it’s 50 years to the month since the communists came to power, you’re playing the Russians, and the name of the guy who scores the winning goal means “Freedom”, how could the town not go wild?
Don’t ever let anyone tell you brutally violent team sports aren’t poetry in motion, man.
The Canucks have the Summit Series, the US has the Miracle on Ice, and now the Czechs have…whatever they’re calling theirs.
Every free nation with a halfway decent team has some gloating story about beating the Russians.
Fucking Russians.
The struggles of the Czech and their resilience has always been an inspiration to me. Darian, have you ever read “A Romantic Education” by Patrica Hampl? It is partly a memoir of her early life and partly a travelogue of her trip to Czechoslovakia to discover her roots, so to speak. I highly recommend it.
I also have Czech ancestors. I visited in 1991–well after the revolution, but also well before Prague became very westernized. It was an amazing experience. And when the Czechs played the Russians in Nagano for the gold, I stayed up and watched to very end (about 3 a.m.) and cried for joy, it was so moving. The scene in Wenceslaus Square was thrilling, esp being so close to the 30th anniversary of the April 1968 Soviet crack-down.
Svobodu!
Judy and I have Czech ancestors in common because we’re sisters, btw. Literally.
Judy, I haven’t read Hampl, and thanks for the recommendation.
I was just commenting, below, about the way things were in the ‘90-’91 period, and I think some of what I’m saying will resonate with you.
What you say about Czech struggles and resiliance reminds me of the end of Smetana’s Libuše when the queen foretells the threats to the Czech nation and proclaims that it will survive. Indeed — and how! Smetana didn’t even know about the Nazis and the communists.
Also, you need a gravatar: http://en.gravatar.com/
Okay, I signed up and uploaded the headshot. Is it working?
Yupper. There you are.
I’m fascinated how someone’s country can be such a source of identity - sometimes it’s easier to understand people when you understand where they’re from. I can only imagine what such upheaval must do to people’s psyches.
It can be useful to work with a set of rough assumptions about attitudes and behavior based on nationality — or, better yet, based on subnational groupings (the smaller the better, of course), especially when more specific socio-economic and cultural conditions can be considered.
Of course, the process of really understanding the underlying factors can last a lifetime. And then there’s the risk of being misled at every turn. Think about how much you might or might not behave like a typical American in the mind of the typical Egyptian, taking into account that your assumptions about even his typicalness are likely to be as flawed as his assumptions about you and yours.
Simon wrestles crocodiles and carries a 12-inch blade in a holster on his back, for example. Amiright?
See, and I made the classic cultural mistake of assuming that everyone on the Internet is a gringo like me…
That’s okay. He wishes he were American just like most people who aren’t. He probably appreciates having passed for one.
Though if I’m wrong, he will beat me to death with a didgeridoo.
Apparently I’m a guero, according to the guys on Olvera Street in LA. That’ll learn me for showing off with my rudimentary Spanish.
Becky, it’s OK. I wish I were American. I really and truly do.
On my passport, anyhow.
You haven’t seen the last of me, California!
Phew. I was joking, of course, but I was prepared to endure the full wrath of the TNB international community.
As always- great to read things that you write…Still waiting for the book….
Hey, lots of people on this website have published books. Just pretend I’m one of them. (That’s sort of what I’m doing…)
Something I sort of wonder about: Where do people live best? From a functionality standpoint, where does humanity hit its high point? Is there such a thing? Can it be quantified? Is it always changing, moment to moment?
I mean, it’s clear that there are worse systems of operation. Burma is no picnic (though my friend has an aunt who has lived there for years, and swears by its people and culture). I’ve been to Cuba. The people were lovely, but the poverty was stark, and one got the very blatant sense that the fix was in.
So assuming democracy is the “least-worst” system of governance, is it even worth asking where it functions best?
Why, in The Magic Kingdom, of course! It’s where all your dreams come true…
Seriously, though, I don’t think it’s a good idea to seek out “bests” when we’re talking about human behavior, which is the main ingredient of all forms of governance.
At best (sorry), I think we can say that liberty is better than oppression. But we have to be very careful about what sort of label we put on liberty — or, to continue with the analogy, we have to watch out for counting the calories in someone else’s liberty and saying that’s it’s necessarily unhealthy because it’s not the brand we choose, or the way we like to serve it.
I always feel like I’m missing out on stuff. I went to Prague in ‘98, the first trip to another country I’d ever taken. And as great as it was — what an amazing city! and the pivo, good God! — I wish I’d gone there sooner, when it was cheaper and grittier and possible to be an American and live there (they were jacking up rents to Americans by ‘98…proving that they did embrace capitalism wholesale).
Have a half-litre of Krusovice for me, will ya?
I was fortunate to have experienced at least a little of the grittiness when I first came in 1990. You’d have been hard pressed back then to find a T-shirt that said “Prague” on it, let alone the now ubiquitous “Czech Me Out” kind. That was also before crystal boutiques and souvenir stores replaced regular shops and markets on Mostecká Street leading to the Charles Bridge — when Nerudova Street was dark at night, the only dim lights shining through the windows of the three pubs along its way (all of which are still there, though only U Kocoura on the bottom corner is still worth stopping in today).
On the other hand, that was also back when the awful brown coal smoke I mentioned hung in the air, and when, indeed, capitalism was about to run rampant and lead to all sorts of scams and schemes that violated the public trust and enriched those who were best positioned funnel off the country’s assets. Though Prague was no doubt beautiful in 1998, I’m sure I wouldn’t have chosen to live where I do now, in Smíchov, which is a much better place to be these days as a result of the kind of makeover that, nonetheless, itself stirs debate about just whose purposes urban renewal is supposed to serve. (Think Washington DC’s U Street district.)
Krušovice dark beer is probably my favorite national brand; but if you make it back this way, let me recommend Hospoda u Bulovky and their microbrewed Richter beer. The scene isn’t nearly so gritty as once upon a time, but it’s authentically Czech, and reasonably priced.
What do you mean, “imperfect liberty?” In America, one is perfectly free to submit or starve when he’s not equal. Perfect liberty is a logical impossibility because, just as the Athenians proclaimed, “The strong do what they will, and the weak suffer what they must.” One man’s liberty will always become another man’s subjugation. Perfect liberty is a fantasy for the well-fed.
But hooray for the Czechs anyway.
I agree that there’s no such thing as “perfect liberty,” any more than there’s perfect anything else. By “imperfect liberty,” however, I simply mean a system in need of improvement, and with real possibilities for achieving it.
Your conclusion seems somewhat self-congratulatory, considerably complacent and completely American.
When we discuss “liberty” without a context of political equality, it’s fatuous because liberty can be anarchy. The two concepts of liberty and equality are not automatically bound to each other, so it’s necessary to make sure they’re tied together in discussion to make the concept of liberty mean anything. If liberty allows the strong to realize their strength and exalt their “unequality,” then the weaker lose their liberty and freedom hangs itself.
Anarchy is a little too much imperfection, I think, for us to strive for.
In any case, please remember that I’m talking about Czech perceptions of the quality of their democracy, not about what I think is the state of America’s body politic. And those Czech perceptions lead them to believe that there are still things about America they’d like to see as improvements in their own democratic system. That’s a good thing, for them and for us.
At the same time, I’m hoping to make the point that there are places in this world where both liberty and equality are scarce; so Czechs might take comfort in how far they’ve come. Likewise, I’m also hoping to hint at the fact that, on the contrary, we might not always want to insist upon models of democracy whose liberty and equality coefficients are instantly where we think they should be. Sometimes it takes a bit more time and patience to get there.
I would not write about these things if I were wholly complacent, and you may know less about what is “completely American” in the eyes of the rest of the world for having spent most of your life in America.
Congratulations on a political ally’s newfound liberty when one is an agent of American power is complacency. It’s not surprising, but it’s still remarkable: Liberty discussed out of any qualifying context is fetishism, and the American government, as the muscle-man of property (à la Smedley Butler), wouldn’t have it any other way.
I’m not an agent of American power — just a bureaucrat…
Okay, then we must change the word, agent, to “agency.”